Estonian Free PressEstonian Free Press
  • National Security
    • United States
    • United Kingdom
    • Europe
    • Estonia
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Moldova
    • Poland
    • Russia
    • Ukraine
  • Counterterrorism
  • Cybersecurity
  • Intelligence

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest National Security News directly to your inbox.

What's Hot

Dodon: Ping-pong între procurori. Mai aveți să vă jucați?

August 13, 2022

Peste 6.000 de votanți sunt așteptați la alegerile locale noi

August 13, 2022

Conflictul transnistrean, discutat de Bolbocean și Klimenko

August 13, 2022
Facebook Twitter Instagram
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
Saturday, August 13
Estonian Free PressEstonian Free Press
  • National Security
    • United States
    • United Kingdom
    • Europe
    • Estonia
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Moldova
    • Poland
    • Russia
    • Ukraine
  • Counterterrorism
  • Cybersecurity
  • Intelligence
en English
en Englishet Estonianlv Latvianlt Lithuanianpl Polishro Romanianru Russianuk Ukrainian
Trending
  • Dodon: Ping-pong între procurori. Mai aveți să vă jucați?
  • Peste 6.000 de votanți sunt așteptați la alegerile locale noi
  • Conflictul transnistrean, discutat de Bolbocean și Klimenko
  • Președinția, ținta unui atac cibernetic: Serverul a fost compromis
  • Cabinet minister switches support to Liz Truss in blow to Sunak’s leadership campaign
  • Cum s-a adaptat Chironda în SUA: Combin depășirea jetlag-ului cu răceală
  • Trump Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant, Property Receipt Show Agents Found Trove of Classified Docs
  • Procurorul Iarmaliuc respinge acuzațiile lui Dodon privind mama sa
Subscribe
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Estonian Free PressEstonian Free Press
Home » Supreme Court justices deliver win for Biden on border catch-and-release

Supreme Court justices deliver win for Biden on border catch-and-release

June 30, 20227 Mins Read United States
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Biden administration has the legal power to end the Trump administration’s “Remain in Mexico” policy, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday, delivering a significant win for President Biden’s immigration policies.

The justices sent the case back to lower courts for another review of the decision-making process. In the near term, the decision appears to grant the Biden administration significant leeway in pursuing its catch-and-release policy at the border.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the 5-4 majority, said the law allows the government to push illegal border crossers back across the boundary to await their immigration court dates, but the command is not mandatory.

“Congress did not intend [the law] to tie the hands of the Executive in this manner,” he wrote. He was joined by Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Brett M. Kavanaugh.

That bolstered the hand of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who has argued that it is a better policy to release the migrants into the U.S. with the hope that they show up for their hearings and possible deportations rather than send them back across the border.

Tens of thousands of people are being released, or “paroled,” into the country each week.


SEE ALSO: Supreme Court rules for states against EPA, Biden climate change agenda


Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., leading the dissent, said it was tough to imagine that Congress envisioned those kinds of numbers when it set up its framework for what is supposed to happen to border jumpers.

He said Mr. Mayorkas is intentionally skewing the options to release more people who have no right to be in the U.S.

“DHS does not have the capacity to detain all inadmissible aliens encountered at the border, and no one suggests that DHS must do the impossible,” Justice Alito wrote. “But rather than avail itself of Congress‘s clear statutory alternative to return inadmissible aliens to Mexico while they await proceedings in this country, DHS has concluded that it may forgo that option altogether and instead simply release into this country untold numbers of aliens who are very likely to be removed if they show up for their removal hearings.”

He was joined in his dissent by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett filed her own dissent, arguing that the case shouldn’t have come before the high court in the way it did, though she said she agreed with the chief justice’s reasoning on the law governing releases.

Officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, the Trump-era Remain in Mexico policy said illegal immigrants who jumped the border and claimed some protection in the U.S. had to go back to Mexico to wait for their eventual court hearings.


SEE ALSO: Biden says he supports changing filibuster rules to codify abortion rights of Roe v. Wade


The goal was to deny them a foothold in the U.S., the incentive that spurred the 2018-2019 migrant surge.

The Biden administration quickly moved to overturn the policy, and Texas led a lawsuit challenging that decision.

Under the relevant law, Congress has laid out three basic options for illegal immigrants who show up at the border — even those claiming asylum. They can be detained throughout their hearings, they can be pushed back across the boundary or, in special circumstances, they can be paroled.

Chief Justice Roberts said every administration, including Republican-led administrations, has used parole “to some extent.”

He did issue a caution to the Biden administration, saying the parole power is “not unbound.”

“DHS may exercise its discretion to parole applicants ‘only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit,’” the chief justice said, quoting the law.

The warning, which echoes his words during oral arguments earlier this year, suggests the high court doesn’t see Mr. Mayorkas having a blank check on how people can be paroled.

Analysts said that could become an issue as the case goes back to lower courts for further review.

Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president of Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, urged the lower courts to quickly approve the Biden administration‘s plans.

“Doing anything else is contrary to our values as a country, fails to uphold our obligation to protect asylum seekers and will cause the deaths of even more vulnerable people,” she said.

Republicans predicted that the ruling would serve as an invitation for migrants to attempt to enter the U.S. illegally.

“President Biden’s reckless rhetoric and actions are encouraging illegal immigration and hurting our country,” said Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican.

The Trump administration created MPP in 2019 as it dealt with the previous migrant surge.

The program started slowly, with Mexico acting as a reluctant partner. As illegal crossings hit a torrid pace in the spring of that year, President Trump warned Mexico to get on board. He threatened to impose crippling tariffs unless Mexico did more. Within days, Mexico’s foreign minister was in Washington to strike a deal.

Mexico agreed to deploy its national guard to try to derail migrants en route to the U.S. and agreed to take back more people under MPP. The border numbers began to drop immediately.

Immigrant rights groups said it is cruel to force migrants back into rough conditions in Mexico. One human rights group has documented thousands of abuses of MPP migrants, including kidnappings and assaults.

The Biden administration, siding with the activists, moved to kill the program early in the presidential term.

Texas and Missouri sued, saying they would bear the brunt of the illegal newcomers.

U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee sitting in Texas, sided with the states. He ruled that the administration failed to justify its decision to kill the program. He cited statistics from the Homeland Security Department that suggested MPP had helped solve the Trump-era border surge.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also sided with the states.

Thursday’s ruling skirted a reality of immigration: The government’s capacity to detain illegal border crossers isn’t up to handling the complete breakdown of the southern border.

If migrants can be detained pending their court hearings, they can be deported. If they are released, data shows, they are rarely deported.

The Trump administration was committed to detention, using powers Congress granted to shift money within the Department of Homeland Security so it could hold more than 50,000 people.

The Biden administration is more skeptical of detention and is leaving thousands of beds empty as it releases tens of thousands of people a week.

In May, Immigration and Customs Enforcement filled an average of 25,429 beds, or about 8,500 fewer than its funded capacity of 34,000. As of Monday, ICE counted 23,981 people in detention, or about 10,000 fewer than average capacity.

During oral arguments on the case, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar muddied the detention picture for the justices by mixing ICE’s longer-term detention capacity with Customs and Border Protection’s holding cells at the border.

Justice Kavanaugh, in a concurring opinion Thursday, said the blame lies with those who guard the government’s purse strings and have shown an “inability” to provide enough money for detention.

“But this court has authority to address only the legal issues before us. We do not have authority to end the legislative stalemate or to resolve the underlying policy problems,” he wrote.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Articles Liés

Russian War Report: Satellite imagery confirms destruction of aircraft at Crimea airbase

August 12, 2022 United States

Trump says Obama took ‘many’ classified documents in latest pushback against raid

August 12, 2022 United States

Arizona won’t wait for feds, starts filling border wall gaps

August 12, 2022 United States

Christians in Taiwan fear ‘severe’ persecution should China conquer island, advocates say

August 12, 2022 United States

The GOP’s Biden separation anxiety

August 12, 2022 United States

Democrats reject cheap insulin for the uninsured

August 12, 2022 United States
Don't Miss
Moldova

Peste 6.000 de votanți sunt așteptați la alegerile locale noi

By woe whAugust 13, 20220

Peste 6.000 de alegători sunt așteptați în cele 3 localități din țară unde, la 16…

Conflictul transnistrean, discutat de Bolbocean și Klimenko

August 13, 2022

Președinția, ținta unui atac cibernetic: Serverul a fost compromis

August 13, 2022

Cabinet minister switches support to Liz Truss in blow to Sunak’s leadership campaign

August 12, 2022
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Our Picks

Trump Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant, Property Receipt Show Agents Found Trove of Classified Docs

August 12, 2022

Procurorul Iarmaliuc respinge acuzațiile lui Dodon privind mama sa

August 12, 2022

Salman Rushdie Stabbed Onstage at N.Y. Event; New Jersey Man Arrested

August 12, 2022

Візові обмеження для громадян РФ справедливі, і всі захисники європейських цінностей мають на них наполягати – звернення Президента України

August 12, 2022

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest National Security News directly to your inbox.

© 2022 Estonian Free Press. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.